More detail in logs on Rules' failure or success with CRM owners
When diagnosing CRM ownership rules, the logs often just say Account Ownership: Not Matched in the Concierge logs. I'd love more detail here-- did it find an account in the CRM that was likely? If so, was the user not in ChiliPiper? Or was the account in the CRM and the owner there but the rule was written poorly? I need a little more detail on matching CP Person to SFDC Account to be able to diagnose what's going on internally. I have seen the little triangle but on failures it rarely gives further detail.
1
vote