Skip to content

Settings and activity

8 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joshua Lee commented  · 

    +1 to this it also only gives the generic you can't book over a busy slot message it would be helpful even if that error message displayed that the meeting buffer would overlap with a busy slot or something

    at minimum show what the meeting buffer allocation is for the selected meeting type (not editable) but so that booking users can at least see that

  2. 45 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Calendar Booker » General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee shared this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joshua Lee commented  · 

    I think that the inability to do this makes it more difficult to plan for and address requested changes to distributions and team personnel. In Legacy we could just add and remove users from queues but in Fire we'd have to create a new distribution and potentially team too

    Joshua Lee supported this idea  · 
  5. 63 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee shared this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Idea  ·  2 comments  ·  Routing » Teams  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Joshua Lee commented  · 

    commenting for awareness as well I agree with Colleen this is critical as we embrace this feature more and have more form fills this will be super important as we continue to rely on this setting

    Joshua Lee supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Joshua Lee supported this idea  ·